Fixing core.atomic

[Guillaume Piolat]

On Monday, 31 May 2021 at 09:26:36 UTC, rm wrote:
>
> I don't consider this a problem. In this case you have a load 
> and a store. This is a non-atomic RMW. On the other hand, you 
> do get sequential consistency synchronization from this process.

I prefer atomicLoad and atomicStore then, because it's explicit 
and it's useless to hide the fact it's atomic behind nice syntax.