Fixing core.atomic

[Max Haughton]

On Monday, 31 May 2021 at 17:51:26 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
> On Monday, 31 May 2021 at 16:34:35 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
>>
>> I prefer atomicLoad and atomicStore then, because it's 
>> explicit and it's useless to hide the fact it's atomic behind 
>> nice syntax.
>
> Yes, you can use it if you want to. We will not remove the 
> regular D atomic functions.

That and the C++ `std::atomic` will provide the same semantics on 
types of wide size (LDC and GDC seem to differ in behaviour here 
when you use the atomic primitive functions.)