Proof of concept for v2 - NO duplication, NO `static if` hell, NO difficulty with interoperability

Dukc ajieskola at gmail.com
Tue Nov 2 11:33:16 UTC 2021


On Tuesday, 2 November 2021 at 05:12:23 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> Or just `std2a`. It should not be a sub-package of std.

I think `std2` is a good idea, but please no `std2a`. It just 
means a needless name change later on. Documenting in bold that 
`std2` is still experimental ought to be enough. If the user does 
not bother with the docs he/she's not seriously avoiding problems 
anyway.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list