Proof of concept for v2 - NO duplication, NO `static if` hell, NO difficulty with interoperability

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 2021-11-03 12:51, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2 November 2021 at 20:24:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Must have been a miscommunication on my part. The two couldn't be more 
>> different.
> 
> I think it was a miscommunication on my part.
> 
> I'm not concerned about adding stuff or change stuff.
> 
> Both std.experimental and std.v2 split phobos in two, that is my problem 
> with
> std.v2.

There's no splitting. You get to use std or std2. New code should use 
std2. Old code can migrate to std2. There's gotta be two by the 
pigeonhole principle. I don't see how this can be done otherwise.

The situation with std.experimental is very different. There a trivial 
claim can be made that there's "splitting" for the simple reason what's 
in one is not in the other.