Phobos version naming

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 11/3/21 8:25 PM, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3 November 2021 at 15:37:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I'd like to devise a robust version naming for Phobos. What is the 
>> best way?
>>
>> Currently it's std.v2 but I'm unclear how it goes from there. By 
>> semver we'd go with std.v2_0_1 and so on.
>>
>> Walter and others say it's better to have "std2" at top level instead 
>> of "std.v2" nested inside std. I confess I chose "std.v2" partially 
>> because it's easier to implement. But we can go either way. What would 
>> be best?
> 
> My pick is stdnext.stuff

And then? stdnextnext?