Phobos version naming

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad]

On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 15:23:46 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> Interestingly enough that's what happened to C++. The draft was 
> C++0x for a long time until they realized they can't make it by 
> 2010. The standard was ultimately C++11, and it was refreshed 
> every three years right on schedule.
>
> I can't understate just how successful their process is. We'd 
> do good to learn from it.

What C++ is doing is nothing like what you propose.

C++ has only one standard namespace and that is "std", ("std??" 
is reserved).

C++ is by and large backwards compatible. Both language and 
standard lib. Only a tiny number of unused features have been 
deprecated and signatures have been modified in non-breaking ways 
for the most applications.