Worst ideas/features in programming languages?

Ola Fosheim Grøstad ola.fosheim.grostad at gmail.com
Mon Nov 8 14:23:15 UTC 2021


On Monday, 8 November 2021 at 14:08:32 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> I thought Rust error handling wasn't easy by default until they 
> added the ? operator, at which point it became like exceptions 
> but better.

Looks like syntactical sugar to me, but I am no Rust expert. It 
means you now loose context, and how do you log?

> To me that was always the issue with error handling without 
> exceptions - how to easily just propagate it up (nearly always 
> what one wants to do). I think they nailed it.

For simple situations maybe, but it looks like a hack, as far as 
I can tell from the docs.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list