Proof of concept for v2 - NO duplication, NO `static if` hell, NO difficulty with interoperability

[deadalnix]

On Monday, 8 November 2021 at 14:16:03 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
>>> but instead we got a numerous features that don't quite work 
>>> (@nogc, DIP1000, @live, ...).
>
> That would indicate to me that dip1000 doesn't work for that 
> purpose, which it does, unless there's something I'm not aware 
> of that isn't an implementation bug. @live isn't, err... live 
> yet. I talked to Amaury about his opinions on @nogc so I get 
> where he's coming from there, but it does do what it says on 
> the tin.

DIP1000, for instance, is unable to cover more than one level of 
indirection.