Want reasonable reference counting? Disable automatic sharing of immutable

[deadalnix]

On Saturday, 13 November 2021 at 23:08:01 UTC, Stanislav Blinov 
wrote:
> On Saturday, 13 November 2021 at 21:55:21 UTC, Steven 
> Schveighoffer wrote:
>
>> You are not getting that the GC collecting has nothing to do 
>> with the pure function's executation. The GC hijacks the 
>> current thread to do its business, and then passes back 
>> control to the caller.
>
> ...while introducing side effects, which the caller of the pure 
> function was promised WOULD NOT HAPPEN, by the interface of the 
> pure function.
>

Dude, I don't want to be rude, but you clearly don't have the 
prerequisite t add value to this thread. It's tiring to have to 
swift through pages of this to get to interesting infos.

Arguably, there may be a problem with the way finalizer are 
handled, but this has zero to do with the topic of this thread. 
You could remove the second function call that you assert could 
still fail. It has noting to do with the call, or it being pure 
of any of what you think it has to do with.

Please do not clutter this thread.