Is there an intention to 'finish' D2?

[Adam D Ruppe]

On Thursday, 18 November 2021 at 12:45:16 UTC, user1234 wrote:
> A problem is that D1 to D2 was a major change with several 
> objectives.

The truth is really we're in the most stagnant part of D's 
history right now.

What really happened with the D1 to D2 thing is that D has always 
been on an evolutionary path and would add and change things as 
needed. "D1" was not really much of a thing - it was just an 
arbitrarily selected maintenance branch while D's existing 
evolution kept going but was rebranded D2.

It isn't like D1 was some stable target and D2 was a radical 
change in development. No, D1 came out only 6 months before D2.