Future of memory management in D

Atila Neves atila.neves at gmail.com
Thu Nov 18 13:56:00 UTC 2021


On Wednesday, 17 November 2021 at 23:45:31 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
Grøstad wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 November 2021 at 23:39:18 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
>> And yet they still post here. It wouldn't be so bad if they 
>> posted things that made sense. They say things like "D forces 
>> you to use the GC" which is clearly nonsense.
>
> If you want parity with C++ *language* features you have to use 
> the GC. So that is an issue.

And those feature would be...?




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list