Is there an intention to 'finish' D2?

[Abdulhaq]

On Thursday, 18 November 2021 at 17:21:40 UTC, Guillaume Piolat 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 November 2021 at 08:55:27 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
>> Is there a set of features that, when fully working, will mean 
>> that D2 is now finished? Or will it forever be in a state of 
>> ongoing feature development?
>>
>> We all know that properly finishing and polishing the last 10% 
>> of a software project takes 90% of the time. Is there a 
>> timescale for that? What platforms will it support?
>
> What is an example of a successful language that would stop 
> feature development?

I specifically explained in a follow-up post, previous to yours, 
that I'm not suggesting that new feature development be stopped. 
I am simply and genuinely asking a simple question. Check my 
previous posts if you think I'm trolling - I'm not.

>
> If D would stop feature development, it wouldn't solve the 
> "billion posts" problem of people not vested in D complaining 
> loudly in the D forums.

I'm not complaining, I'm explaining why I think that corporate 
users are not using D. I'm hoping to help those people who *do* 
care about why D remains relatively unknown and unused, and I'm 
doing it politely. I don't feel the tiniest emotion about it, I 
just want to give a POV that I think can help lift the number of 
users.