DIP1000: Walter's proposal to resolve ambiguity of ref-return-scope parameters

[Dennis]

On Thursday, 25 November 2021 at 20:45:41 UTC, Stanislav Blinov 
wrote:
> https://dlang.org/spec/function.html#parameters needs to get 
> __simpler__, not turn into a PhD thesis, which it is already 
> well on the way to.

My proposal (as mentioned in the issue) is that `return` in any 
other position than directly before `scope` refers to return-ref, 
so only `return scope` results in return-scope. Also I think 
`lazy` and `out` can go, though suggesting to remove a feature 
tends to bring out people who like the feature and oppose the 
removal.

What do you propose?