DIP1000: Walter's proposal to resolve ambiguity of ref-return-scope parameters

[zjh]

On Friday, 26 November 2021 at 15:42:13 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:

> See this post for why C++ `&` is more complicated and harder to 
> understand than D `ref`:
> https://forum.dlang.org/post/rlssnqdidtsqjwxpmudb@forum.dlang.org

`C++` references, which look complicated, are actually simple.

And D `ref`, no matter what, I hate it.
A '&' is `Ok`,why not `use` it?
There are too many 'attributes', can we delete? I'm writing 
functions, not `attrs`.