How about some __initialize magic?

[Stanislav Blinov]

On Sunday, 28 November 2021 at 03:19:49 UTC, russhy wrote:
> I would love to be able to do:

This is orthogonal to this discussion. Even if concise 
initializer syntax that you suggest was allowed...

> ```D
>
> T* t = alloc();
>
> (*t) = .{};
> ```

...that's an assignment. I.e. that would lower down to 
`uninitializedGarbage.opAssign(T.init);`. Destructing garbage 
and/or calling operators on garbage isn't exactly the way to 
success :)

Which is the crux of the problem in question, and why things like 
`emplace` exist in the first place.