How about some __initialize magic?

russhy russhy at gmail.com
Sun Nov 28 16:44:17 UTC 2021


On Sunday, 28 November 2021 at 08:54:39 UTC, Stanislav Blinov 
wrote:
> This is orthogonal to this discussion. Even if concise 
> initializer syntax that you suggest was allowed

let's improve it then, let's play more with it

instead of introducing new functions/templates

i feel like this is the perfect place to have such improvements 
take place


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list