How about some __initialize magic?

[Stanislav Blinov]

On Sunday, 28 November 2021 at 16:36:05 UTC, russhy wrote:

> this is the exact same issue

No, it isn't.

> It's the same with enums

No, it isn't.

> And now you want to same for everything else

No, I don't.

> ``(*raw1).__initialize(forward!(arg1, arg2));``
>
> more typing! templates!! more long lines!!! more slowness!!!!

Way off mark here.

>> This is orthogonal to this discussion. Even if concise 
>> initializer syntax that you suggest was allowed

> let's improve it then, let's play more with it
> instead of introducing new functions/templates
> i feel like this is the perfect place to have such improvements 
> take place

This topic has nothing to do with what you're talking about.