A couple of extensions to `with` that would be worthwhile
b2.temp at gmx.com
Wed Oct 13 13:21:42 UTC 2021
On Wednesday, 13 October 2021 at 13:20:02 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
> On Wednesday, 13 October 2021 at 13:16:36 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>> I think that the point of proposal 1 is to have something
>> like, after lowering to common AST constructs:
>> auto xpath = ....;
>> scope (exit) destroy(xpath)
>> // stuff
>> // destroy(xpath) really happens here
> Destructors are already called automatically at the end of a
> block scope.
so proposal 1. is definitively not useful.
More information about the Digitalmars-d