Nim Nuggets: Nim talk at Strange Loop 2021
Sun Oct 17 06:57:09 UTC 2021
On Sunday, 17 October 2021 at 05:26:25 UTC, Araq wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 October 2021 at 04:17:38 UTC, jfondren wrote:
>> About 50% of it is inadvertent praise for D. The rest is ARC
>> and C++ interop.
> Ha, good one. So where is D's hygienic AST macro system that
> lets you reflect over types? No, string mixins and experimental
> std.reflection in some offside branch don't count.
D may not have an AST macro system but has had
full compile-time type introspection for probably a decade (if
not more). What's your point?
More information about the Digitalmars-d