Make using compiled libs with debug code better
rikki cattermole
rikki at cattermole.co.nz
Mon Oct 18 23:29:09 UTC 2021
On 19/10/2021 12:17 PM, Paul Backus wrote:
> My radical idea (which I also brought up on Discord) is that we should
> enable *all* contract checks and asserts in release mode by default, and
> tell programmers to use `debug assert(...)` if they want a particular
> check to be removed in release builds.
That isn't radical at all.
"I believe that range checking should be used far more often than it
currently is, but not everywhere. On the other hand I am really assuming
infallible hardware when I say this; surely I wouldn't want to remove
the parity check mechanism from the hardware, even under a hypothetical
assumption that it was slowing down the computation. Additional memory
protection is necessary to prevent my program from harming someone
else's, and theirs from clobbering mine. My arguments are directed
towards compiled-in tests, not towards the hardware mechanisms which are
really needed to ensure reliability." - 1974 Structured Programming with
go to Statements - Donald Knuth.
In context having the default be sanity checks turned on, is probably
the right way to go.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list