Suggestion for DUB users: The vanity package

[Tobias Pankrath]

On Tuesday, 19 October 2021 at 14:36:17 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
>> It "just works", is pretty simple to remember, easily 
>> extendable, and you can be pretty sure no user of your library 
>> will run into conflicts. I encourage anyone considering 
>> publishing a package to do the same.
>
> I like this idea. We should put this on the dub documentation 
> to make more users do this.
>
>
> However some projects are quite generic, I think having some 
> common idiom there like calling generic packages `util.atomic` 
> or `util.money` would be good.

What about `vanity`?