The new rule for DIPs by language maintainers was a mistake

[bauss]

On Tuesday, 19 October 2021 at 18:25:21 UTC, ClapTrap wrote:
>
> Did people actually think that getting someone to write and 
> submit the DIP on behalf of a "language maintainer" would 
> somehow make the "language maintainer" unbiased when it came to 
> reviewing it? That seems hopelessly naive if you ask me.
>

Not gonna lie, most of the D community sometimes seem very naive.