Thoughts on versioning

Adam D Ruppe destructionator at
Thu Oct 28 14:47:13 UTC 2021

On Thursday, 28 October 2021 at 14:30:38 UTC, Steven 
Schveighoffer wrote:
> On 10/28/21 10:18 AM, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
> if there was implicit construction
> This is going to still be a bit painful. I was thinking for 
> more compiler help.

well, if there was implicit construction, the compiler would do 
that conversion for you, c++ style.

but yeah today you can import the other thing and do the 
conversion yourself....

> I personally would rather just use the v2 exclusively, and 
> eliminate any usage of v1.

I think that ought to be the goal. You'd keep the v1 stuff around 
just as a temporary bridge to give some flexibility to schedule 
that transition, but realistically, the transition is inevitable 
unless you want to lock everything (which is always an option of 

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list