Send me your list of D gripes and wishes

[Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole]

On 25/12/2022 7:57 PM, Max Samukha wrote:
> When the specification is lacking, it is not clear what code is valid. 
> In the case of -mv, the spec says (or rather implies) 
> package.module=path/filename, but the implementation also allows 
> package=path, which I find reasonable and rely upon. If the 
> implementaion gets 'fixed' to conform to the specification, I will be 
> very unhappy.

Stuff like this its pretty clear that the specification is the one that 
needs fixing, not the implementation.

Do a PR, then you won't have to worry about this going forward ;)