Discussion Thread: DIP 1043--Shortened Method Syntax--Community Review Round 1

[bauss]

On Tuesday, 8 February 2022 at 17:11:19 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 February 2022 at 17:03:25 UTC, Doigt wrote:
>> you'll see exactly that they also have a case for lambda 
>> expressions with no return values
>
> Which example is that? Do they assign it to a value of a 
> different type?
>

I think the whole argument is that this will work in C#:

```d
int Value
{
   get => _value;
   set => _value = value; // This is okay
}
```

But it won't work in D according to this DIP:

```d
int value() => _value;
void value(int newValue) => _value = newValue; // This will not 
work
```

So instead everything becomes inconsistent like:

```d
int value() => _value;
void value(int newValue) { _value = newValue; } // This is ok obv.
```

However, now the code looks inconsistent and not intuitive at all.