Feedback Thread: DIP 1043--Shortened Method Syntax--Community Review Round 1

[Dukc]

On Friday, 4 February 2022 at 10:57:17 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> ## Feedback Thread
>
> This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community 
> Review of DIP 1043, "Shortened Method Syntax".

A simple feature, A simple DIP, simply good!

The only issue I can find is this:

> Function contracts are not possible with function literals, so 
> this DIP does not address the issue.

Contracts are allowed with function literals, they just are not 
allowed with the arrow syntax. This is a good reason to keep them 
out of shortened functions too, but the reason stated here is 
inaccurate.