Discussion Thread: DIP 1042--ProtoObject--Community Review Round 1
Paul Backus
snarwin at gmail.com
Tue Jan 11 15:01:35 UTC 2022
On Tuesday, 11 January 2022 at 13:45:35 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> The whole point of the standard library vocabulary types is to
> provide common abstractions that the whole ecosystem can rely
> on.
>
> If every D shop has to come up with their own interfaces
> because the ones offered by the DIP don't cut, then what is the
> purpose of having them in first place?
+1. Unless the runtime and standard library themselves intend to
use the interfaces, I cannot see what useful purpose they serve.
As-is, they could be cut from this DIP, and nobody would miss
them.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list