Discussion Thread: DIP 1042--ProtoObject--Community Review Round 1
elronnd at elronnd.net
Sat Jan 15 09:24:43 UTC 2022
On Saturday, 15 January 2022 at 06:20:03 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
>> Hm, we do have !(x > x+1) for floats...
> That is equivalent to x <= x+1 so that holds for numerical
!(x > x+1) works for nan too, which is why I wrote it the way I
did. NB. I believe d used to have operators like !> specifically
for this reason.
More information about the Digitalmars-d