A separate GC idea - multiple D GCs
Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad at gmail.com
Sun Jan 23 12:30:03 UTC 2022
On Saturday, 22 January 2022 at 21:45:36 UTC, Elronnd wrote:
> On Saturday, 22 January 2022 at 19:43:33 UTC, Ola Fosheim
> Grøstad wrote:
>> If you change the TLB, then affected address ranges should in
>> general be flushed although maybe this is too pessimistic in
>> the case of a fork.
> I assume you would only lose TLB, not cache.
I wouldn't make any assumptions, what I get from a quick Google
search fits with what I've read on this topic before: on ARM a
TLB flush implies a cache flush, and
[tldp.org](https://tldp.org/LDP/khg/HyperNews/get/memory/flush.html) describes the pattern for Linux as: flush cache, modify, flush TLB.
More information about the Digitalmars-d