Metaprog can be abstruse

[bauss]

On Monday, 4 July 2022 at 10:37:14 UTC, user1234 wrote:
>
> still the same problems as the initial version (even if yes I 
> know it's absurd code)

I'm actually not sure what you're even trying to achieve or what 
problem you're trying to solve tbh.

Could you perhaps give an example of what your expectations are 
and how exactly this differs from your expectations of runtime?

Because my modified version of yours works both at ctfe and 
runtime, so it has nothing to do with ctfe really. The only thing 
ctfe about is that it's statically initialized, but you can use 
it for runtime arrays too, where the function will be executed at 
runtime.

So there's really no metaprogramming involved in that.