Syntax sugar for {} with structs

[ryuukk_]

On Wednesday, 6 July 2022 at 16:23:58 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 03:51:56PM +0000, ryuukk_ via 
> Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
>> D likes to steal common words that i can't use in my APIs
>> 
>> `debug`, `version`, `init`, `destroy`
>> 
>> It forces me to come up with annoying alternatives
>> 
>> `dbg`, `versionn`, `create`, `dispose` (but i really need 
>> `destroy`)
>> 
>> This is poor design in my opinion
>
> https://dlang.org/dstyle.html
>
> Quote from section "Keywords":
>
> 	If a name would conflict with a keyword, and it is desirable to
> 	use the keyword rather than pick a different name, a single
> 	underscore ‘_’ should be appended to it.
>
> This is just a recommendation, of course. But at least you 
> wouldn't have to invent new words for your identifiers.
>
>
> T

That's not something i like, more care should have been put when 
deciding to name and  put a function in the global scope, i 
shouldn't have to pay for that