version(number) is completely useless

[Andrey Zherikov]

On Wednesday, 20 July 2022 at 16:26:28 UTC, Hipreme wrote:
> That's why I said about SDL.2.5
> It will be compatible to all version until SDL.2.0
> That is more than enough for that, specially because breaking 
> changes you could put under a new major versions, and if 
> they're not compatible, you will be declaring another version 
> rather than a number.

I see one issue with this: you assume semver notion of versions. 
This might not work for everyone - there are a lot of software 
that have `<year>` as a major version which has nothing to do 
with breaking changes.