On Wednesday, 27 July 2022 at 05:08:24 UTC, Araq wrote: > > No, that's not how Nim's ORC works. It is precise and doesn't > need Boehm. But nice try to conflate my decade of hard work > with some vaporware clown language. That was because of bugs in ORC where it was necessary to revert to an earlier GC type, for example Bohem. Will ORC be production ready?