Using closure in function scope to make "real" private class members

[forkit]

On Wednesday, 1 June 2022 at 12:24:23 UTC, Dukc wrote:
>
> Frankly, I don't think this thing is worth doing any hacks for. 
> Controlling the scope of encapsulation is rarely that critical, 
> and if it is, it's easier to just put the class to it's own 
> file.

That only option available to me in D, to ensure that my class 
has truly 'private' members (so that no other code within the 
same module can access them), is to put it in it's own module.

That's so sad.