Using closure in function scope to make "real" private class members

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad]

On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 11:25:46 UTC, forkit wrote:
> Still, I think I'd prefer 'hidden' actually. It's pretty clear 
> what you're stating here with that word.

It is important that it sounds like it is less accessible than 
"private", I guess "hidden" sends that message.

«hidden from module»

«private to module»