Using closure in function scope to make "real" private class members

[forkit]

On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 11:49:26 UTC, bauss wrote:
>
> I don't like it, it seems to add much more clutter, like 
> imagine some long generic type name.

Yes, I agree. Too much typing ;-)

.. and what happens if you mistype??

Forget that idea ;-)

btw. interesting (but old) discussion in the scala commmunity 
around this idea:

I think they ended up dropping private[this] in scala 3 anyway, 
despite this proposal to keep it.

but the conversation is interesting.

https://contributors.scala-lang.org/t/proposal-to-retain-private-this-in-scala-3/3829