dip1000 and preview in combine to cause extra safety errors

claptrap clap at trap.com
Wed Jun 8 19:18:20 UTC 2022


On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 17:50:18 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 16:58:41 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 16:32:25 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
>>
>
> The problem is `foo` and whether the compiler should somehow 
> prevent the inconsistency between the signature and 
> implementation. Obviously the answer is “yes, ideally”, but in 
> practice with @safe, @system, dip1000, @live and so on it’s all 
> a mess.

Isn't the DIP process supposed to catch these sorts of things?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list