dip1000 and preview in combine to cause extra safety errors
claptrap
clap at trap.com
Wed Jun 8 19:18:20 UTC 2022
On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 17:50:18 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 16:58:41 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 8 June 2022 at 16:32:25 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
>>
>
> The problem is `foo` and whether the compiler should somehow
> prevent the inconsistency between the signature and
> implementation. Obviously the answer is “yes, ideally”, but in
> practice with @safe, @system, dip1000, @live and so on it’s all
> a mess.
Isn't the DIP process supposed to catch these sorts of things?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list