Using closure in function scope to make "real" private class members

[zjh]

On Thursday, 9 June 2022 at 01:28:28 UTC, zjh wrote:

> There is no `cognitive load` at all!
> Only the `"module"` encapsulation extends to the `"minimum 
> class"` encapsulation that should exist.

`One sentence` can explains it,there is no `cognitive burden`!!!