dip1000 and preview in combine to cause extra safety errors

[Timon Gehr]

On 6/10/22 05:07, Walter Bright wrote:
> 
>> hence the compiler should do the wrong and lazy thing implicitly by 
>> default. This just makes no sense. What's the big harm in annoying 
>> lazy people slightly more? It's not like they won't complain loudly 
>> about `@safe` by default in any case.
> 
> I'm the recipient of all the complaints that I'm breaking their existing 
> code.
> ..

I am aware. But if that's your concern it kills the DIP on its own. If 
anything, you'll receive more complaints with the broken behavior, 
because then nobody is happy, not even @safe-by-default advocates.

>  > May as well do it right or not at all.
> 
> This entire thread is what happens with "not at all".

Well, I contest that. It's not even closely related. This is an issue 
concerning `@system` code. What's the default has not much at all to do 
with it.