Why is D unpopular

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad]

On Monday, 13 June 2022 at 10:13:30 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Monday, 13 June 2022 at 10:03:59 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> It wasn't the subclass that tried to access, it was the owner 
>> of the subclass, the module.
>
> *Through* the subclass.

No. You have direct access.

>> If the owner of Cyborgs
>> If a surgeon can operate
>
> I'm a Parker. My father is a Parker. But if you ask me for the 
> contents of my father's safe, and I don't have the combination, 
> then you aren't getting the contents of my father's safe. Ask 
> me to put you in touch with my father though, and you can work 
> something out.

This is not an example of inheritance. Inheritance is a 
[subtyping relation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subtyping).

If you let the Surgeon module own the Human blueprint and direct 
access to all the brains of all Humans, then it follows that the 
Surgeon module has to be given direct access to all Humans 
whether you know if that Human also is a Woman or not.

Keep in mind that there are no pure Humans in the real world, 
only Men or Women (or some other gendered variations). The fact 
that we can instance Humans does not mean that they are not Women 
or Men. It means that we don't care (or know) whether they are 
Women or Men when we give them a computer representation.