Discussion Thread: DIP 1043--Shortened Method Syntax--Final Review

[bauss]

On Wednesday, 15 June 2022 at 11:45:14 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>
> Otherwise the concern about void is valid but I think that this 
> can be solved easily during the semantic passes: if we're in a 
> func and if we're in a shortened func then if this func is void 
> then inserts a void cast to the expression. No technical issue 
> there, as long as there's a flag that makes shortened funcs 
> recognizable after lowering.
>
> ```d
> // void f() => 0;
> void f() {return cast(void)0;}
> ```

Yes, to be honest; I don't really care about how it's solved, 
just that it's possible to write code equivalent to what I can in 
C#.