Adding a new design constraint to D

[Basile B.]

On Thursday, 16 June 2022 at 09:04:25 UTC, bauss wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 June 2022 at 09:01:56 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
>>
>> I volonteer but be warned I'll propose to introduce "super 
>> private".
>
> No that is ambiguous because it sounds like it's private to the 
> super class.
>
> It absolutely cannot use the super keyword.

meh in this context "super" would mean "really really"