Adding a new design constraint to D

[surlymoor]

On Monday, 20 June 2022 at 09:30:18 UTC, bauss wrote:
> On Monday, 20 June 2022 at 09:01:09 UTC, surlymoor wrote:
>> On Monday, 20 June 2022 at 08:25:34 UTC, forkit wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 19 June 2022 at 22:45:44 UTC, forkit wrote:
>>>>[...]
>>>
>>> I'm happy (more than happy actually) to conclude my input 
>>> into this discusssion with this:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Then draft a DIP to get the ball rolling.
>> But you won't.
>
> Why waste hours writing a DIP when there's a better chance of 
> winning the lottery than to have this accepted as a DIP.
>
> I think it's okay to express your dislikes and what you wished 
> D could do better, without necessarily putting in the work 
> yourself for the change; especially when it is something as 
> divided as this.

I'd be hypocrite to disagree, but the topic at hand, as you've 
noted, has been exhausted. And yet, the main complainant seems to 
still have plenty of energy. Thus, why not put that towards 
something more substantive instead continually serving stale 
bread?