`restricted` member variables

[bauss]

On Tuesday, 21 June 2022 at 08:55:19 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 21 June 2022 at 08:37:55 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
>> I am actually against any changes to the current situation. 
>> Module-level private is *designed* to break encapsulation, so 
>> breaking the invariants by module-level functions is expected.
>
> Yes, I agree. Either be consistent with the idea that the 
> module is the boundary for encapsulation or not.
>
> It is better to give priority to plugging the holes that 
> prevent people from writing code than preventing the compiler 
> from accepting ill-conceived programs.
>
> The current D compiler accepts too many programs, but that can 
> be fixed with a linter.

D will do anything to not have class private.