`restricted` member variables

[12345swordy]

On Tuesday, 21 June 2022 at 13:50:35 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Tuesday, 21 June 2022 at 12:53:06 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
>> You don't have any data to substantiate "much more useful", do 
>> you?
>
> Unfortunately, this answer did not convince me that something 
> needs to be changed.

Is anyone here actually advocating to redefining private here? I 
don't see why are you so opposed to optional features, unless 
there some major drawback that outweighs the benefits that I am 
unaware of?

-Alex