Discussion Thread: DIP 1043--Shortened Method Syntax--Final Review

[forkit]

On Wednesday, 15 June 2022 at 09:21:12 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>

I'd much rather be throwing my support behind a DIP that would 
give me the option for better encapsulating my class, than 
throwing my support behind something that is 'purely stylistic'.

But my gripes aside, yes, I do support this DIP.

As mentioned in the DIP, its is stylistically consistent with the 
use of lambda expressions in the composition of ranges, which I 
use alot.

Although it's not something I need, and not something I would 
find myself asking for, I recognise the benefits that others see 
in having it. And given it is stylistically consistent with 
features already in the language, I think it should be approved.