Discussion Thread: DIP 1043--Shortened Method Syntax--Final Review

[rikki cattermole]

On 29/06/2022 1:38 AM, welkam wrote:
> Thank you for providing excellent example for an argument against this DIP.

The code that you are quoting is already valid D.

```d
string name()          => "abc";
double calculateArea() => 5.3f;
```

This is not and will be with this DIP.

It is extending existing syntax to a place where it should have been 
supported all along.