private(this) vs LINT

[Daniel N]

On Tuesday, 28 June 2022 at 00:18:17 UTC, zjh wrote:
> On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 20:23:26 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
>> I was just thinking, if we had a standard linter, it could 
>> solve many issues without bloating the language, since the 
>> compiler exists as a library it should not be too difficult to 
>> maintain either.
>>
>
>
> `D` isn't it out of the box? Why do you need `'linter'`? If you 
> need it, `Sb` is making a mistake.

I don't understand this argument, we deliver dub as a separate 
tool together with dmd it's not part of the dmd binary either, 
you still can use dub "out of the box", all you have to do is to 
include the official linter with the standard installation of dmd.