unique ownership + unlimited safe generational references

Nick Treleaven nick at geany.org
Wed Mar 30 14:19:36 UTC 2022


On Wednesday, 30 March 2022 at 12:39:40 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
>
> You would need a lock on the object, so it is far worse than 
> ARC?

Wouldn't you need a lock on the object anyway if you're accessing 
its fields? If not, why can't we access the generation field of 
the object without a lock too?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list