I just created a dub package. Frankly, the whole thign is backward.

[Egor Pugin]

On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 10:46:52 UTC, Tejas wrote:
>
> Over here, you can see how people don't like `dub`, and would 
> like to use something else while still managing to provide 
> packages to the community as a whole
>
> I'd reckon that people build their code using whatever software 
> they prefer, but publish their code on `conda` for easy usage, 
> allowing the flexibility of their preferred tool, while 
> maintaining the easy accessibility of their package.

After my previous work I do not see this as scalable approach.
Having different build tools makes it harder to publish, 
distribute and control.

My idea is that everything related must be in one tool.
Having one tool allows you to control everything.